data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec120/ec1208eb44a9abf2ae0a486fe84d44afc47e9d85" alt="" |
Art by Benjamin Carre |
The latest SF Signal Mind Meld is up, and this one asks the question, "
How do you define the sub-genre of 'Swords and Sorcery'?" For answers, they turn to the contributors (and co-editors) of my recent anthology,
Swords & Dark Magic: The New Sword & Sorcerydata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6b3d2/6b3d25c31579cc3a3894e5d14187472766d983f0" alt=""
.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00a60/00a60decfeeb51f71a16934a2a07fc32e4df0323" alt=""
Answers come from such luminaries as Michael Morcock, Joe Abercrombie, Garth Nix (whose answer takes the form of a poem!), CJ Cherryh, Glen Cook, Bill Willingham, JK Parker, Tanith Lee, Tim Lebbon, James Enge, Scott Lynch, Jonathan Strahan, and Yours Truly.
The entire post is well worth reading, though I think I'm going to find myself quoting Moorcock's "Captain Blood meets Cthulhu" quite a bit in the coming days.
No comments:
Post a Comment